Tuesday, 14 November 2023

On Sympathy for the Young

In my last post, I linked to a Wired article which purports to be about a Ghibli-inspired D&D 5th edition setting, but which is really about the bigger issue of 'wholesomeness' and the need which young people nowadays seem to feel for media that is, for want of a better word, 'nicer' than what they are used to.

There was a time when I would have dismissed this is the whining of softies, and accused youngsters of wanting to be special snowflakes. But in recent years I have increasingly come around to the position that life simply is psychologically harder for young people nowadays than for previous generations (those born after, say, the 1950s), for all that it is materially more secure. I therefore have a lot of sympathy for the idea that we could probably do with a more wholesome media landscape in general than the one to which we have become accustomed. 

What, though, do I mean by life being psychologically harder? Really, there are three linked phenomena at work.

The first is I think obvious: smartphones. I am glad that there appears to be a head of steam now building towards more robust regulation of these devices, and that there is increasingly more recognition of what should have been evident all along - namely that the effect of smartphone use on the developing brain is nothing short of disastrous. But I still think we are at the very foothills of our understanding of the deleterious consequences of widespread smartphone use. My day job brings me into contact with hundreds of young people every year, and I increasingly see what I have witnessed over the past decade as something like a slow-motion apocalypse. People who are eighteen years old in 2023 are almost a different species to people who were eighteen years old in 2012, and they bear the countenance of people who have been mentally scarred by the mere process of growing up. It's not their fault: they have been subjected to what can only really be thought of as relentless psychological assault, driven by a technology which is designed to be addictive in a way that puts crack cocaine to shame (all the while going through what everyone knows to already be the toughest period of life - the teenage years). It is desperately sad, and I think in ten or twenty years' time parents will have a lot of apologising to do to their children for allowing all of this sorrow to be caused under their watch. (I direct your attention in particular to this recent article for a very interesting and lucid analysis of a central aspect of the phenomenon, which is the problem of loneliness and involuntary celibacy.)

The second is also evident to most thoughtful people, and it is the fact that the world has simply become a lot less social, and a lot 'colder', over the past thirty or so years. Technology has obviously facilitated this. But whatever the cause, the texture of life has fundamentally and drastically altered. One should not look back on the past with those famous rose-tinted glasses, but there were many ways in which life was simply more communal, more supportive, and more forgiving than it is now. I grew up in humble circumstances in one of the poorest regions of the UK, but there were lots of compensatory factors that made life cheerful - kids playing in the street, neighbours looking out for each other and lending each other money where needed, community groups and clubs, religious meetings, pubs and newsagents on almost every street corner, big family gatherings. The importance of this dense web of sociality has radically diminished in my lifetime, and for young people in particular things have become as a consequence just a little bit, well, shit. They have fewer opportunities to develop, fewer opportunities to make friends, fewer opportunities to meet romantic partners in a natural way, and fewer opportunities to mix with people from different generations. All of this adds up to a feeling of being largely alone against a cold and unfriendly world (with only fake online sociality to compensate).

The third is more diffuse, but I think perhaps the most important of all, and it is the spiritual consequence of feeling as thought there is not a great deal of purpose to being alive. Most young people nowadays leads lives of comfort that previous generations could not have imagined. And vast swathes of them are able to postpone the transition to adulthood almost indefinitely with university, postgraduate study, extended periods of living at home. This is in one sense an astonishing privilege, but it is also a curse. Part of what makes life feel as though it is worth living is the sense that what one does matters. One gets this sense, very keenly, when one has to lead an independent life as a productive contributor to society - paying the bills, raising a family, doing a good job at work. One does not get it from studying something vaguely interesting for year after year (unless one is very academically gifted) or from living at home with Mum and Dad and temping. In short, young people now grow up in an atmosphere almost of enforced listlessness. And this saps the soul in a way that people of my generation (who were generally expected to stand on their own two feet from the age of eighteen) cannot quite imagine.

I do not wish to misinterpreted: life was materially very hard for my family when I was a kid, and is still materially very hard for very many people even in purportedly wealthy societies like Britain's. Life is materially much harder still in the developing world. And life was also undoubtedly psychologically harder in many ways for certain categories of people in previous generations - soldiers who had fought in war, gay people who were relentlessly bullied, and so on. But I'm not sure that previous generations ever had to deal with this strange malaise that has set itself like a pall over the lives of our current youth, and which seems almost purposively designed to direct their energies only to the most soul-crushing aspects of life: consumerism, light entertainment, pornography, the self. 

What is to be done about this is beyond my pay grade. But facilitating people getting together with their mates and enjoying a wholesome pastime together to my eye seems like one of the most important contributions that anybody can make by way of a remedy or palliative. It at least might be a bit of an antidote to the unrelenting sordidness that the internet has become. And in that sense, I wish Obojima the very best of luck.

45 comments:

  1. "kids playing in the street, neighbours looking out for each other and lending each other money where needed, community groups and clubs, religious meetings, pubs and newsagents on almost every street corner, big family gatherings. The importance of this dense web of sociality has radically diminished in my lifetime, and for young people in particular things have become as a consequence just a little bit, well, shit."

    I'm reminded of Kurt Vonnegut's frequent, plaintive cry on behalf of the miserable, lonely and depressed: that we evolved to live in smallish clans where everybody knew everybody else for life and everybody shared common interests and values, and in the absence of at least a reasonable facsimile of these we inevitably feel like shit.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think we also have to include climate anxiety (which I prefer to call climate dread) - the certain knowledge that we will live through a horrifying period of environmental collapse. It's hard to care about having kids and building a life for yourself when you stand on that precipice.

    Heroes in TTRPGs can save the world. The real world is driving off a cliff with a brick on the accelerator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. First of all, sorry for the very long answer, but your comment inspired me.

      I'm a ''young'' (31 years) spanish man who has been educated all my life knowing about climate change and all that stuff and, sincerely, I'm not worried at all. I'm very aware that possibly we are going to live a rough time, and I understand that's a toll to a lot of people. But I sincerely think that the problem is that our society has excluded death from itself, so the thought of physical suffering or poverty is the BIG PROBLEM, when it has been the norm for humanity for millennia (and, sadly, it's still the norm in a lot of parts of the world).

      Death is the ultimate taboo, and we are surrounded by her, but in the end nearly no one wants to think about it. Because everything that you are, that you think, that you want, that you had, that you love... Is going to disappear. And we'll become the old photos, the old tombstones and crumbling bones (or ashes). In the end, nothing. And after that... Well, that's a matter of faith, and that's not the purpose of this comment to discuss that!

      So what? What are we going to do? Choose to die now, because we are going to die later? We can't dread our life away! Dreading because life is going to be difficult is meaningless if you compare it with the ultimate truth: your life is going to end. We all are going to die, and that's not a bad thing: it's simply human nature.

      This is not a call for living your life stupidly, or without worries. Not at all! It's simply a call for living your life... thinking about your life! Not thinking about the (possibly) horrible future, or death, or suffering. The world will give you horrors, death and suffering. That's only natural. So we don't need to add more of that in our own life. In the end I think that we all don't want to think that we missed our life having fear, even if the situation is fearsome.

      Take it from a man whose father died when he was only 1 month old. When my mother was my age she was a widow that had 2 sons (1 and 4 years) and had to work very hard to provide for her already broken family. Life is fragile. Life is hard. Life is not going to be how you want. But it's your life, your only life, and dread is not the answer to that.

      Now I'm going to wash myself because I hate when I sound like a mindfulness coach or some shit like that. Because it was not my intention at all. I... I don't really know what was my intention, I was only inspired to write this.

      TL;DR: Life is short, live a good life, yada yada yada. 

      Delete
    2. I don't wish to deny that some people feel climate anxiety. But I don't think it is at all widespread. If the great mass of young people genuinely thought that environmental collapse was nigh, they would be behaving very differently.

      Climate change is certainly happening and will be disruptive, but the IPCC has predicted nothing like generalised environmenal collapse. It's important to get away from media hype, which is always incentivised to make everything appear worse than it really is.

      Delete
    3. I'm 29. I think that it's going to be terrible.

      Me and my wife's decades long plans are about surviving this.

      Everyone my age that I know assumes that it'll be terrible, too.

      The only difference is they assume that shooting themselves in the head at 50 to 70 is the way out, not moving to Alaska so that they can die.

      I don't know why you think that we would think otherwise, and I'm not sure what difference in our behavior you'd expect to see. I'm a bit annoyed at your presumption. You get to check out before it gets really bad.

      Delete
    4. What basis do you have for thinking this, though? I repeat: nobody serious is talking about generalised environmental collapse as a result of climate change. The IPCC's website is very clear. It has all of their reports. They are not talking in these terms.

      Climate change is a problem that needs dealing with and mitigating but the idea that it will bring about the collapse of human civilisation is just not credible. I suggest you make other decades-long plans.

      Delete
    5. I think people go by media hysteria not by IPCC reports. Also people try to make sense of the world by imposing meaning on the nonsensical. Many Americans believed Saddam must have been behind 9/11, otherwise the Iraq war wouldn't make sense. They believe there is good evidence of looming environmental collapse, otherwise Net Zero and other climate hysteria wouldn't make sense.

      Delete
    6. I never said collapse. You said collapse. Civilization or whatever will long outlast me. But the tropics will become unlivable, tropical diseases will expand, extreme weather events will get more common, more carbon dioxide in the air will make everyone slightly stupider, refugee crisises will expand and multiply, and so on and so on. Things can be terrible without destroying the world. Covid was terrible. Hurricane Katrina was terrible. The world continues to turn.

      Delete
    7. I'm not sure I understand your argument. Hurricane Katrina and Covid happened and in the end things were ok....so therefore....don't have kids? I mean, if you don't want to have kids, that's fine, but I hope you realise your stated reasons do not make any sense.

      Delete
  3. Young people who can function at a decent level are going to do very well in this future. We cant use a GenX work force forever, and after them well need skilled milennials and GenZ or no work will get done. Thats why its important to teach them practical skills if you get the chance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is true, and something I try to impress upon them. If you're halfway competent then you are going to be able to clean up!

      Delete
    2. Would you want to be the top tier of an incompetent society?

      Delete
    3. It's better than not being in the top tier of one.

      Delete
    4. It's a depressing offer, and if you present it as the best option, it makes suicide look appealing.

      Delete
    5. I'm not 'offering' anything. Your choice, as ever in life, is to try to do well or kill yourself - or the third option, which is to do nothing. It's obviously your decision to make. You seem to be seeking validation for being miserable - I'm not going to give it to you.

      Delete
  4. I was going to comment something, but I've just written a long-ass reply to another commenter and I'll try to be simple.

    I'm ''young'' and I totally understand what you are talking about, because I recall my childhood and even my late teens and, knowing that my lived experience does not prove anything, I really think that things were different. Society was not so polarized, consumerism was not as clinical and brutal and the excess of entertainment could be cut by turning off the TV (or the PC, if you were a nerd... Like myself).

    Do you remember when we talked in chat rooms or messenger and we said 'logging' out, see ya tomorrow'? But nowadays we never log out. We have the stores in our houses, the TV's and chats in our pockets, and everything connected to our wallet. Even our brain, but that's more like a metaphor.For now. 

    I think that we are not really aware of the big ass change that the last 20 years have been for our society. And for my work I've met a lot of young adults and teens these last years and I'm worried for a lot of them: Not for our future or some shit like that, no: I simply think that they are, indeed, living very harsh lives!. But, I need to say, I've met a surprisingly big bunch that are pretty solid people, This strange world did not broke them, and I respect them a lot. 

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well in my day you had to call your friends on the phone! ;)

      Delete
  5. I have just accepted the malaise. There is no purpose to life beyond replacement part for the economic machine.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Things feel very different if you get married and have kids.

      Delete
    2. Having kids can feel pointless or even wrong if you honestly feel there is no purpose to life beyond replacement part for the economic machine.

      Delete
    3. Yes, it requires a leap of faith.

      Delete
    4. I posted this comment originally. I am married; we share a similar outlook. All we do is work. There is no money for vacations or time for making friends or other joys. We will never own a home or retire. Why would we entrap another soul in this?

      Well, the answer seemed more obvious when we were young: surely things will improve if we work hard, and our children will enjoy that. But at 30 I can't remember the last time things seemed to be getting materially easier or less, how to put it, "broadly lonesome." Post-COVID cost of living and the broad acceptance that the world should be nothing more than a playground for the rich has soured me on leaps of faith.

      Delete
    5. So the remedy to a pointless existence is to make more pointless existences. I'm not convinced.

      Delete
    6. I simply repeat: yes, it requires a leap of faith.

      Delete
    7. So does killing yourself in expectation of a better afterlife.

      "It requires a leap of faith" is simply "just trust me bro" with a better education.

      Delete
  6. Mockman here. I’m torn. I mean, growing up in the 80s I definitely felt dread about environmental pollution and overpopulation, and nuclear war too (though I agree the current climate moment feels very real, perhaps it was more theoretical then). And there was the pervasive homophobia, and other bad things which are arguably less common today, like you mentioned. But if you really think that smartphones and social media are mutating us and especially damaging kids who grow up immersed in them… I don’t have a good answer for that one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aggh, sorry, I thought this comment vanished into the aether! Sorry for repeating myself. Feel free to delete both of these if you like. - Mockman

      Delete
  7. Mockman here. I occasionally enjoy light happy games like the Obojima article is stumping for— I love Golden Sky Stories for instance. But I do also really love games (and all fiction) as catharsis, a way to really WALLOW in whatever bad stuff you are worried about, and hopefully exorcise it. I like both horror movies and action movies, and essentially I think a good action movie has an element of a horror movie except that the loathsome villain gets defeated and punished. It’s satisfying to pick at your scabs, to get yourself scared on behalf of some fictional victims and get yourself angry at some fictional villain.

    ….but I’m also aware that there are some people who really do NOT like this and hate “wallowing in it”. For whatever reason I enjoy fictions & games which address things that disturb and frighten and upset me, and some other people don’t. Basically, the kind of people described (and endorsed) in this article. I probably have limits too but they are sufficiently outside the bounds of normal RPGing that they’re rarely pushed. 😂

    Growing up in the ‘80s, I did feel an amount of dread over the environment (maybe not as urgently as people do today) and nuclear war, and of course there was stuff like the omnipresent homophobia & transphobia. So although the economy is a little worse and we’re a little closer to climate apocalypse I do feel the urge to push back on the idea that things are objectively much worse now. But I don’t have a counter argument for your suggestion that smartphones & social media & pervasive internet surveillance really are mutating and destroying us (i type this on my cellphone, which I’ve been glued to for 20 minutes, while I’m theoretically walking the dog….). But I do think some of the preference for light or dark entertainment comes down to individual character.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is no doubt that for every generation there are struggles. What I think is worse now is the general sense of soul sickness. There are an awful lot of people I encounter who just seem to have checked out, or see no purpose in life, or are just going through the motions. I don't remember things being that way when I was young (although being young of course makes you percieve the world a different way).

      On catharsis...I agree, and that's why I find a lot of Ghibli films pretty unsatisfying, precisely because they generally avoid a payoff at the end. I understand that a lack of clear resolution and a recognition of complexity is the point...but sometimes you want a clear and simple resolution!

      Delete
  8. (Although I agree there’s definitely a trend towards softer entertainment, even though I personally tend to crave meatier & more gruesome & confrontational stuff. So maybe I’ve managed to talk round in a circle, if my individual tastes are just a reflection of the gruesome time I grew up in) - Mockman

    ReplyDelete
  9. "So they went straightway and mingled with the Lotus-eaters, and the Lotus-eaters did not plan death for my comrades, but gave them of the lotus to taste. And whosoever of them ate of the honey-sweet fruit of the lotus, had no longer any wish to bring back word or to return ... "

    or if you prefer, the Joyce:

    " Mr Bloom went round the corner and passed the drooping nags of the hazard. No use thinking of it any more. Nosebag time.

    He came nearer and heard a crunching of gilded oats, the gently champing teeth. Their full buck eyes regarded him as he went by, amid the sweet oaten reek of horsepiss. Their Eldorado. Poor jugginses! Damn all they know or care about anything with their long noses stuck in nosebags. Too full for words. Still they get their feed all right and their doss. Gelded too: a stump of black guttapercha wagging limp between their haunches."

    ReplyDelete
  10. Geeks have been marginalized and ostracized since they exist, otherwise they wouldn't be geeks - merely being interested in intellectual pursuits is enough. I wasn't very enamored with "playing in the streets", for example, even in the oh-so-cozy '80s. I wanted something way more substantial, like a C64 or a game a bit more involving than idling around a board as dictated by some stupid dice without any player intervention or meaningful decision at all. I got it all eventually, right at the end of my bleak and boring childhood. So it's a bit problematic for me to bemoan the dark fate of today's wimpy youth or shed sincere tears over its immense difficulties.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I grew up in the marginalized geek community too. It was rough, but at least it was a "community". Imagine being a geek in a vacuum - no friends to LAN with, no fellow coders to consult, nobody at your D&D table... being bullied and being lonely are two very distinctive forms of suffering, and while it looks like the bullying is mostly lessened these days, it has seemingly been replaced with loneliness and the loss of community, which is ultimately an equal (if not worse) source of suffering. And loneliness is a misery multiplier; compound that loneliness with looming global catastrophe (be it climate change, economic downturn, or belligerent superpowers), and you've got a recipe for some really messed up kids.

      Delete
  11. Brilliantly articulated! Your post is a standout, offering insightful perspectives. Thanks for sharing your wisdom.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "Its different when you get married/have kids". Okay, maybe but in most cases the whole dating and mating process of people, at least in the west, is utterly fucked by generations of bullshit. Most men are seen as little more than walking ATM by predatory women, boys don't perform well in school anymore and are increasingly the bottom run of society, they get called 'toxic' for being true to their nature and those who do have the sexual appeal/credentials to be popular with women become little more than sex fiends trying to rack up a 'pussy count' because deep down we know there is no more value in long term relationships. Then society look at a generation of young men ruined by compounding societal factors (like single mothers and reconstituted families) and scream "Ew, yuck incels!"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I think modern dating life looks terrible from the outside - hence the sympathy.

      Delete
  13. A good read. And also very salient for me as a psychotherapist. If neurosis was the primary dysphoric ailment of older generations, existential angst seems to be the the defining one for the newer generations.
    "It takes a village" is showing its absence in all sorts of contexts these days.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Welcome to the post-Christendom, neo-pagan, materialistic world that denies death. This scenario you described is well mitigated in religious communities, where people seek to live on the basis of universals. But you guys in the Anglo-Saxon liberal world are screwed and don't even know how much. From what you eat to the lack of spiritual life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't necessarily disagree with any of that. Man is a religious being; without religion, it seems, societies simply do not perpetuate themselves.

      Delete
  15. This is a bit of a late post, but to be honest as a young person - I don't think we really need pity.

    We aren't dead. Our souls are still alive, as much as yours, Sir. You grew up in a world that had certain things which you surely treasure - but I don't know if I would take it over the world I grew up in.

    I know you say the world has gotten colder, but as someone who grew up in it I honestly feel at home in it. Maybe this is just a world with less illusions - because history shows that our past Presidents, governors and statesmen were no less ruthless than anything we could imagine today. Even in the 50s, it was us who led a coup d'etat in Guatemala, or implemented the Jim Crow laws, and so on.

    At least some of that, like the overtly racist laws, seem practically impossible to me today.

    I grew up in a world where I can seek most any knowledge I need online; where we have more or less dealt with the incredible racist laws - if not attitudes - of the good ol' days; where I can feasibly travel from a small town to a place with opportunity and actual jobs but still talk to my family every week.

    And this world is possible only because of the efforts of the previous generation. I know we have our own issues. Real estate gets higher and higher, we're likely to be the first generation poorer than our parents, and dating and having a kid is definitely not easy - but I do still like the world I grew up in.

    ReplyDelete