Yet I was also really into Counting Crows, Dawson's Creek and Changeling: The Dreaming.
When I try to explain to my kids what the dominant aesthetic of the mid-late 90s was like, I will call it 'sincere'. This was before the internet set off an irony bomb under everything (circa 2003), before a pornographic style and attitude began to pervade the popular culture (beginning from I think the noughties), and before social media started to make everyone really angry and depressed (from, say, 2014). It was a time during which we were encouraged to see the best in one another and to look to the future with optimism. The teen films of this era are distinguished by being positive about the relations between men and women in particular: think of American Pie, Clueless and Ten Things I Hate About You. They are all about boys and girls learning to get along - especially about boys figuring out how to be sensitive and emotionally aware. These films don't undercut this message with meanness or archness. The message was sincerely meant. Back then, we valued the idea that everybody could learn to rub along.
Dawson's Creek was the apogee of this turn towards sincerity. As much as it had elements of humour, the series was unrelentingly intense and serious about teenage travails. Sex was not pornographic or transactional, but imbued with almost metaphysical meaning; divorce was treated as weighty and agonising; homophobia, snobbery, mental breakdowns and the like were considered sensitively; above everything else, the storylines revolved around finding love, which seems almost passe to our irony-infused, post-internet gaze.
And the look of the series - let's just go balls to the wall and call it its mise-en-scene - buttressed this mood. In Capeside, it always seems to be late summer or early autumn. The music is earnest, romantic, singer-songwritery, po-faced. The visuals are elegaic, somehow evoking nostalgia in its teen audience for an era which has not yet passed - the era of their own youth, passing before their eyes. Phenomenologically, watching Dawson's Creek was a bit like being transported into the future to inhabit one's own middle-aged self, and looking back at one's own teenage years through the rose-tinted spectacles of time and distance; it somehow felt simultaneously set now (1998), but also set then, as 1998 imagined as the semi-distant past.
The music of Counting Crows also seems to encapsulate this era. Adam Duritz's lyrics are expressionistic, romantic; his heart is worn on his sleeve; he never tries to be funny or sexy, but always earnest about emotional affairs. The relationships he depicts are imbued with drama and pathos. They all seem to matter, not just to him, but somehow to the very universe itself - as though part of some grand narrative in which matters of the heart are all engaged. It is all so very sensitive (a word which women used to useall the time, it seemed, in those days: "If only I could find somebody sensitive.")
Watch Duritz go - this, whatever else you might say, is a very sensitive man:
It could just be timing, but I can't help but feel that something of this aesthetic filtered into role playing games, perhaps in Vampire: The Masquerade, but most notably in my experience in Changeling: The Dreaming. I never really played Changeling, not much, because the way it was presented by White Wolf made it essentially unplayable; but what I did do was look through it lovingly and wallow in the waves of bittersweetness and nostalgia for lost youth that seemed to wash out of its pages. It struck exactly the same kind of notes as Dawson's Creek did: it felt elegaic, sorrowful about the passing of time, veiled by late-summer sunlight, and above all obsessed with the importance of feelings sincerely felt.
If you're not sure what I mean when I refer to this aesthetic, then looking at some internal art from Changeling communicates it, I think, perfectly. I mean:
There is a bit of mid-late 90s sincerity to the D&D of that era, as well, to my eye - indeed, it wouldn't surprise me at all to learn that Monte Cook had also been into Counting Crows, Dawson's Creek and Changeling: The Dreaming. This was the period during which TSR, and WotC after it, really began to get serious about PCs having an emotional life of their own rather than being mere ciphers for the players. Gradually, it began to seem as though it mattered for PCs to have personalities, feelings, and relationships. Dungeoneering and gaining treasure was passe; what began to matter was story and "role playing rather than roll-playing". The whole enterprise came to be very sincere as a consequence.
Sincerity is entirely defensible in TV, film, literature and music, but not, I think, in the context of games, where it easily becomes very cloying and awkward. With that said, a little goes a long way: the OSR often seems to pride itself on having a lack of sincerity, and a sprinkling of a little po-faced sentimentality may be what is needed to freshen things up a bit.
I'm around your age (41 at the moment) and a lot of what you're writing about sounds VERY familiar.ReplyDelete
I really like your description of a mood of fading summer, of being nostalgic for something that isn't gone yet, all of that seems very 90's. And there was certainly a very well-developed sense of po-faced depressive earnestness.
I'm just not sure how "sincere" a lot of that was.
I remember in the time of Beavis and Butthead, American Beauty, Fight Club, The Matrix and all the rest being enthusiastic about things was seen as fake. If reality was washed out and bittersweet then NOT being mopey, detached, and bittersweet was like the Italian leather sofa in American beauty, the Ikea furniture in Fight Club and the, well, Matrix in The Matrix just a bunch of fake shit that had to get peeled away to get at the heartfelt sorrowful core of reality.
This mean caring about a lot of stuff got seen as suspect (at least in my high school) and you had a lot of well-developed juvenile performative apathy.
I think this is where all of the ironic crap of the next decade came from. If caring about stuff was suspect then the best way to care about things was to care about it ironically and that's where we got hipsters and all the rest from.
American Beauty seems very much in the "sincere" vein, to me. Think about the plastic bag scene. The message of the film seemed to me to be about exploding suburban superficialism to find the real emotions underneath.Delete
Yes, exactly. It's just that a lot of this sincerity brings to mind the famous Groucho Marx quote "The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made." I'm not saying that it was ALL fake, but in a lot of places (like my old high school) the sort of cultural milieu that you're talking about here was strong enough that all kinds of honest enthusiasm got dismissed as superficial to the point that just honestly really liking shit got looked down on as phony. Remember Catcher in the Rye making a big comeback at that time, and that kind of juvenile try-hard falling everything "phony" was pretty popular at the time.Delete
Not saying there wasn't good things to this time or that we haven't replaced it with stuff that's a lot worse in a lot of ways (will happily take performative apathy over modern frothing rage) just that I don't think a lot of that sincerity was all that sincere...
It's odd: the culture of that entire period between the "end of history" and history's reunion tour on 9/11 is a complete mystery to me. I only see a sea of meh, and can't distinguish between any of it (except for a bit of stuff from 1996, when I worked at a "digital lifestyle" magazine and so got to learn who Oasis and the Spice Girls were). That's partly, no doubt, down to my age, but also because I spent the first half of the decade immersing myself in the most wilfully obscure culture I could find, and the second half as the parent of a small child, barely engaged in any culture other than Thursday night comedies on BBC2. Even now, there's little from that period that I can get a purchase on (and *no* American TV series to date that I can sit comfortably and watch). I seem to have a blindspot which makes it all recede to grey. And the sincerity of it feels to me so... insincere; pure sheen.ReplyDelete
I haven't really encountered any RPG stuff from that era previously (my playing petered out pretty much exactly as the 90s started, and as the Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay that I loved got sidelined in favour of what felt like a bunch of shark-jumping stuff about space orcs). I wasn't at all aware of the more wistful "sincere" side of RPGs that emerged during that period, but looking at the stuff here - again, my vision slides off the veneer every time I try to look at it.
I'm half aggressively fond of the spikier 80s aesthetic I grew up with, and half jealous that I'm unable to appreciate the sincerity which I'm sure you're correct in saying is there, but which to me feels shallow.
(And I do think the "end of history" had a lot to do with this aesthetic: once folks grew up no longer expecting to die in a nuclear war, the only thing that was left to care about was our emotions, and the floodgates opened to a new soft-airbrushed culture that was perhaps too subtle and nuanced for me to pick up on).
And there, it seems, is the border between Gen X and the Millennials.
You are terribly old and clapped out!Delete
Can I be one but not the other?Delete
"I am old, but alive. Perhaps as you age, you will find the two are not mutually exclusive."Delete
"Late 90s aesthetic?" I missed that there even was one.ReplyDelete
Sadly (perhaps), I stopped listening to new music circa 1996...and skipped out watching television from 1992 till 2000 or thereabouts. I've never seen Dawson's Creek and know nothing about it. Had to look up Counting Crows to remember that song "Mr. Jones"...in my memory, that all just melts into the stupid Blues Traveller, Dave Matthews, crap summer music. I tended to listed to darker stuff...things I don't listen to now because I'm in a happier, more well-adjusted headspace (ahh...the silly angst of youth!). All the stuff from that decade NOW, regardless of genre, seems so...mm...rough/sad/depressing. It wasn't *earnest*...but it was all (lyrically) about sad, real life shit. Whether the sound was upbeat or heavy. Where once only thrash metal was doing negative themes (if they weren't singing about their favorite horror or scifi novel) suddenly everyone was expressing their childhood traumas and broken relationships and chemical addictions and issues regarding money and religion, etc.
The excess 80s glam rock, "good time" party stuff shuffled over to the hip-hop scene. Rock became a variety of ways to be introspective about their shitty personal beefs. Just a different way to be immature (whining, bitching and moaning)...but whatever, that's fine. Musicians have to eat, too, and the genre was "different." At least we could understand 80% of Sublime's lyrics (as opposed to 10% of Nirvanna's and 50% of Soundgarden's). Give 'em some money.
I played Vampire the Masquerade from 1990 till 1994. Thought the whole line of WoD was interesting and acquired as much of it as I could, right up till Wraith the Oblivion. Then I took a powder...it stopped being about gaming and started being about fiction and exploration of fiction. And I'd already found (through the earlier iterations) that it was immensely difficult to find/make a meaningful GAME with such stuff. Lord knows I tried. Found more...mm..."girlfriends" through those games (I'll use a charitable term) than satisfactory escapism. Eventually chucked it all and simply pursued the girls and recreational pharmaceuticals solo withOUT all the "gaming."
Till I started dabbling with D&D again (in the 2000s).
The early 90s were a continuation of the late-80s which (in my little world) was a reaction to the bullshit brought about by Reagan and his cronies. The end of the Cold War suddenly gave folks...what?...an opportunity to contemplate the shallowness of their lives and/or their society's values after living for a decade like It-Can-End-At-Any-Time-So-Let's-Get-Our-Rocks-Off.
Earnestness? No. Directionless-ness.
Much of what's come down since has, unfortunately, been worse. In most every regard. However, I've found that children (and even young adults born since the late 90s) are generally KINDER to each other than any generation ever before. All the polarized assholes out there, spoiling for a fight, are geezers my age (or older). The kids are nice, even if they're a bit soft and their music is all auto-tuned and shit. Hopefully they'll make a decent future.
I don't know if kinder is the right word. They seem very milquetoast to me. Is that the same thing as being kind?Delete
If you can't have kind, then milquetoast will do. I don't think the polarisation belongs to any one generation, though. Boomers aren't swatting ASMR streamers, doxxing TERFs, or denouncing their own professors for the crime of heterodoxy. I doubt boomers know what those first two examples even mean.Delete
Yeah, young people deploy their aggression online. This might be why they appear so nice in person. They've got no bile left for their daily interactions.Delete
Young people absolutely are kinder, to their in-group at least, though they have little or no forgiveness or tolerance of transgression.Delete
The best thing by far I have read about Gen Z is John Higgs' book The Future Starts Here - it takes a very optimistic view (as does all of his writing - he is, after all, the person who coined the phrase "pessimism is for lightweights") but one that I find hard to fault. One of his main theses is that Gen Z marks the human race's return to collectivism and groupthink - individualism has only been the norm for a little over half-a-century of our species' existence, and it could be argued that it's individualism which is driving the species to extinction. Lynch mobs are no fun, but they're what humans have always done to keep the species in line.
The book opens with a section on how Gen Z look at the film The Breakfast Club, a view which is both a bit mind-blowing and also so fucking obvious that it's a wonder we Gen Xers and Millennials got the story so completely wrong all of this time. You can read it here:
Yeah, I've got to be honest but that sounds like mendacious Panglossianism to me. It's easy for John Higgs to be blithe about lynch mobs - Jews, Jim Crow-era black people in the US, and gay people in Iran might beg to differ. Not to mention anybody who happens to have expressed a different opinion to the prevailing orthodoxy at almost any point in history, from Vaclav Havel to Galileo. It also sounds a bit historically ignorant. The West's interest in individual liberties goes back to the Enlightenment - arguably back to Christianity - and is probably the reason why we're not still living like medieval serfs.Delete
I always hated The Breakfast Club, by the way, so I can at least agree with him on that!
While I am, admittedly, one of the loudest mouths 'round these parts when it comes to stereotyping the younger generations, I've got to voice some quibbles with the on-going thoughts on this thread:
1) No, I don't think "milquetoast" is an adequate description. There's a difference between caution and timidity, and the former can often be mistaken for the latter. The thing with younger people is (perhaps) that they THINK more: they weigh and judge things in a way that older geezers (sometimes) have a hard time doing. They are less likely to simply "buy-in" to accepted thoughts, until they have had it proven to them...they have been too well educated about the multiple POVs and perspectives of various sides/cultures, to simply take the "established norm" at face value. Sometimes, perhaps, too much thinking is to their detriment, but extra reflection is probably (in general) a "good" thing.
2) Internet platforms allow folks a "safe" (i.e. "anonymous") space to express their negativity in a way that they wouldn't in daily life. We all have negative feelings, but MOST folks would be uncomfortable expressing themselves with the same vitriol in person that you see on-line...not the least of which would be because of the real world consequences they'd face (from a punch in the mouth to social ostracism to legal ramifications). For better or worse, human-computer interaction is going to feel SOMEWHAT like a person is just playing a video game...and generally we have been conditioned that what we do to the pixelated "people" in a video game doesn't matter. Rather, it's promoted: take your violent fantasies to your game console; shoot virtual people not real people. It is HARD for folks to see the effect of their Twitter words/actions with the computer buffer between, and I don't think there's nearly enough study (and education) that's been done on the subject (perhaps that will be the NEXT generation's leap in development/evolution). Right now, geezer's like me are inclined to say: hey, you know you can turn the computer off, right?
3) RE "Little or no forgiveness or tolerance of transgression" -- this is NOT an aspect limited to younger generations: ALL humans have (historically) had little or no forgiveness/tolerance of transgression. But what counts as "transgression" CHANGES historically over time. Once Christians were thrown to lions for speaking against the Roman gods; once "witches" were burnt at the stake for not being good Christians (or passive and submissive women).
"Group-think" and mob mentality is a pretty powerful, pretty real thing...I think that's been (generally) proven. Recently we've seen it weaponized for political purpose in ways I would have thought unimaginable (getting engaged, patriotic (if sadly misled and ignorant) Americans to attempt a coup of their own government? Are you fucking kidding me?).
Without the courage of individuals willing to separate from the herd and push back against the established thought of the masses, change happens ONLY with extreme slowness, if at all. Humans are a species prone to inertia (it helps with species survival to keep doing the things that allow you to live), with a tendency to fight change until absolutely inconvenient to do so. And while we may admire the individuals that have the courage and intellect to break with tradition -- the Jesus, Gandhi, and Liz Cheney types -- the sad fact is that OFTEN they are unappreciated in their own lives, OFTEN they face persecution from breaking with norms, OFTEN they die before seeing the full fruit of their labors. And ALSO for every EFFECTIVE iconoclast who knows what they're doing, there are a dozen or two "individualists" who are either A) terribly bad at communicating their ideas (and thus will never amount to nothing), or B) egotistic assholes who are working for their own selfish interests rather than the collective good (i.e. the benefit of the populace stuck in their "group-think").
4) The Breakfast Club is an interesting time capsule into the 80s but Higgs and his Gen Z'ers may be judging it too harshly. The film isn't about rebellion: it's about seeing that underneath the veneer of various "labels" we are equals and ones that can be understood by each other if we take the time to try. Most teens...still...can find themselves identifying with one or more of these individual characters, and can ALSO see how we tend to label and stereotype others (unjustly) without really getting to know them. Deriding the Bender character as a sleeze and a bully is as bad (and is missing the point just as much) as the Gen X kid who sees nothing but a cheer-worthy comeuppance to an obnoxious authority figure. The film SHOWS this, by the way: in the scene between the principal and the janitor, they discuss how they were the same when they were kids (even if one adult has a harder time acknowledging it). The separation between individuals is MAINLY illusionary...we all go through the same emotional trials and travails, even if we do so in different fashion from each other.
Nah, it's not Panglossism, nobody's claiming this is the best of all possible worlds, quite the opposite. Higgs often makes the distinction between blind optimism, that of Pangloss, and... I forget what he calls it, necessary optimism, something like that. His point is that if we can't imagine a future that is better than the present, then how can we possibly build one? And most people nowadays, it seems, can't. There are no more flying cars, only a multiplicity of dystopias.Delete
BTW Higgs said nothing about lynch mobs, and never would, that cynicism was entirely mine. And I wasn't saying they were a good thing. I was saying that they were preferable to the extinction of the human race. Probably.
Regardless, I really do recommend reading the book. I've got a spare copy you're welcome to have.
I could say many bad things about media from the 90s, but sincerity is definitely in there too. There were lots of stupid and perhaps overly dramatic things, but you always felt that they really meant it.ReplyDelete
Thinking back, I think even AD&D 2nd edition had that sincerity. In hindsight, I find Forgotten Realms material from the time excessively quaint and pastoral, to the point that I wonder how you are supposed to play a monster slaying game in it. But it came definitely across as sincere.
Yes, I agree, and it's a good observation about Forgotten Realms. Like the platonic D&D session would involve no combat at all.Delete
I feel like Ed Greenwood was channelling that Tolkien tension when creating the Realms. Like Tolkien would have preferred LotR to be just hobbits bimbling about the Shire, but I guess there has to be an epic, continent-wide clash between good and evil, fine. Anyway, about Bombadil's boots...Delete
Terrifyingly, I think Tolkien would have preferred LotR to mostly be about elves singing and reciting poetry.Delete
About the replacement of sincerity with sarcasm in mass-marketed media since the '90s, I agree to a point, but my comment is to help readers understand that the '90s was not the time that "it began to seem as though it mattered for PCs to have personalities, feelings, and relationships. Dungeoneering and gaining treasure was passe; what began to matter was story and 'role-playing rather than roll-playing.'" Already in the '70s, RPGs that featured relationships as part of character generation existed. Debates about the nature of role-playing were fervent already then, when dungeoneering had become passe for many indeed before 1980. D&D's mass-market success eclipsed that. If memory serves, I first saw the expression "role-playing not roll-playing" in an ad for Chaosium games in the early '80s. One need look no further than games like Pendragon (1985) and Ars Magica (1987) for systems in which characters' emotions and relationships are part of the individuals' stats or generation, or earlier to the systems in games like Champions (1979), The Fantasy Trip: Into the Labyrinth (1980), and GURPS (1986) in which relationships or emotional tendencies can be character traits. It is not correct to link the origin of this kind of role-playing sincerity with the aesthetics of the 1990s, although they coexisted. Already by 1978, there were macho detractors of namby-pamby or awkward feelings in immersive role-playing and such unmanly decadence as chivalric romance in RPGs. And never mind the old discussions about sincere loyalty to "alignment"!ReplyDelete
I don't have much to add I don't think - I came of age in the late 80's and early 90's. It is striking to me listening to you speak about that time how many similarities in terms of my experience - it seemed to me at the time that punk rock, heavy metal, comics, what little anime there was available to westerners, and RPGs were all kind of inextricably linked. That said, I don't know if I have ever thought about music / RPGs/ comics of the 90's as particularly sincere - but I see your point. It brought to mind a quote from David Foster Wallace which floats through my consciousness every so often:ReplyDelete
"The next real literary "rebels" in this country might well emerge as some weird bunch of anti-rebels, born oglers who dare somehow to back away from ironic watching, who have the childish gall actually to endorse and instantiate single-entendre principles. Who treat of plain old untrendy human troubles and emotions in U.S. life with reverence and conviction. Who eschew self-consciousness and hip fatigue. These anti-rebels would be outdated, of course, before they even started. Dead on the page. Too sincere. Clearly repressed. Backward, quaint, naive, anachronistic. Maybe that'll be the point. Maybe that's why they'll be the next real rebels. Real rebels, as far as I can see, risk disapproval. The old postmodern insurgents risked the gasp and squeal: shock, disgust, outrage, censorship, accusations of socialism, anarchism, nihilism. Today's risks are different. The new rebels might be artists willing to risk the yawn, the rolled eyes, the cool smile, the nudged ribs, the parody of gifted ironists, the "Oh how banal". To risk accusations of sentimentality, melodrama. Of overcredulity. Of softness. Of willingness to be suckered by a world of lurkers and starers who fear gaze and ridicule above imprisonment without law. Who knows."
The quote is from an essay written in 1993 ("E Unibus Pluram: Television and U.S. Fiction") so perhaps there was something in the zeitgeist of the time that wanted to try this out!
This makes me think of how the attitude that used to be called "punk" is now called "edgelord". Rebellion can serve many useful purposes, but it can also be petulant egoism, and Foster Wallace seems to overlook that.Delete
That's an interesting observation. The quote is a bit out of context but I always thought he was saying that what we have considered rebellious in literature has outlived its usefulness and at this stage is more an expression of the kind of petulant egoism you describe and that perhaps the next set will learn from this and embrace all the messy stuff that goes with being human!Delete
Wholesome Games and the Cozy aesthetics are the reiteration of this kind of sincerity for the gen z media consumer. Games like Animal Crossing, Spiritfarer, and Ryuutama scratch that same itch of meaningful contemplation of serious and weighty topics in an environment of support and nurturing the growth of philia/agapē-love that you described.ReplyDelete